Anti Federalist VS Federalist

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/11/20071115-14.html

Original Title: Bush Delivers Remarks at Federalist Society's 25th Annual Gala

Author: Not Stated                                               

Date & Source: 9.08.08, The White House

Thesis: The Federalist needs to be more respected, and that the government should be more organized.

Class Connection: I think that this article is focusing on the Federalist side, because

in the article they are saying that the constitution is a good thing, there aren't putting Negatives on the constitution.

Personal Response: I think that the article has a lot to prove about being Federalist.

What I see from this article is that they are talking about how the government needs to be separated into three equal branches and that each of those branches are very important and no matter what we must take the responsibilities. I do agree with what they are saying in this article, they said that the governments do not appreciate the nominees.

Challenge:  In the article I found online I read, "Their solution was to separate the government's powers into three co-equal branches: the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. Each of these branches plays a vital role in our free society. Each serves as a check on the others. And to preserve our liberty, each must meet its responsibilities -- and resist the temptation to encroach on the powers the Constitution accords to others." I made a connection with the article The Federalist NO.51 because in this article they talk about the three co equal branches which are executive, Legislative, and Judiciary. They both talk about how important they are and that there maybe some difficulties with them but we have to take responsibility.